![THE CONTEMPORARY LAW FORUM](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="440" height="87"><rect width="100%" height="100%"><animate attributeName="fill" values="rgba(153,153,153,0.5);rgba(153,153,153,0.1);rgba(153,153,153,0.5)" dur="2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></rect></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="440" height="123"><rect width="100%" height="100%"><animate attributeName="fill" values="rgba(153,153,153,0.5);rgba(153,153,153,0.1);rgba(153,153,153,0.5)" dur="2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></rect></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="491" height="276"><rect width="100%" height="100%"><animate attributeName="fill" values="rgba(153,153,153,0.5);rgba(153,153,153,0.1);rgba(153,153,153,0.5)" dur="2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></rect></svg>)
The Supreme Court’s Interim Order in the Rohingya Deportation Case: A lost Opportunity?
In this post, the author talks about the non-refoulement principle from an international as well as domestic perspective, in the context of the recent Supreme Court interlocutory order allowing the deportation of thousands of Rohingya refugees to Myanmar.