LEGAL MORALISM: A TENUOUS PRINCIPLE OF CRIMINALISATION
In this article, the author aims to critically analyse the principle of legal moralism and explain as to why criminalisation of conduct cannot be justified on grounds of morality alone.
In this article, the author aims to critically analyse the principle of legal moralism and explain as to why criminalisation of conduct cannot be justified on grounds of morality alone.
In this article, the authors have analyzed the Supreme Court’s recent reference to intersectionality in the case of Patan Jamal Vali v. State of Andhra Pradesh, by exploring the background and history of the term as well as the domestic jurisprudence and evolution of the concept in India.
The author highlights Indian Judiciary’s tryst with technology in the wake of Covid-19 and makes recommendation about further developing and implementing the system.
In this post, the authors analyse the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Triloki Nath Singh v. Anirudh Singh and argue that the Court erred in its findings by deviating from accepted legal principles regarding representative suits and compromise decree.
In this post, the author presents an analysis on the much debated question of victim’s right to appeal for enhancement of sentence. Emphasising upon the need to find a balance, the author presents compelling arguments from both sides of the spectrum.
In this post, the author proposes to examine a very important finding in the judgment that the “non-deposit of compensation in Court does not result in lapse of acquisition.”