10 April 2025

bail

A Critique of Naresh Meena v State of UP and the Practice of Marriage-Conditional Bail in India: Part II

[continued] Statutory and Constitutional Violations The practice of granting bail to rape accused on the condition that they marry their victims is legally indefensible. As demonstrated through the critique of various high court rulings in the previous section, these judgments blatantly violate multiple statutory provisions in the IPC, POCSOA and PCMA, disregarding the legal framework […]

A Critique of Naresh Meena v State of UP and the Practice of Marriage-Conditional Bail in India: Part II Read More »

A Critique of Naresh Meena v State of UP and the Practice of Marriage-Conditional Bail in India: Part I

Introduction The Indian judiciary has a disturbing history of granting bail to rape accused on the condition that they marry their victims. This practice is not only legally flawed but also profoundly unjust, as it forces survivors into coerced relationships with their perpetrators rather than ensuring their right to justice. Such rulings violate multiple statutory

A Critique of Naresh Meena v State of UP and the Practice of Marriage-Conditional Bail in India: Part I Read More »