TCLF ONE-ON-ONE| Ep. 23 ft. Mr. Abhishek Nangia: A Discussion on IT Rules 2021
In this episode of TCLF One-on-One, Mr. Abhishek Nangia, Partner at RNA Technology and IP Attorneys talks about IT Rules 2021, OTT censorship and more.
In this episode of TCLF One-on-One, Mr. Abhishek Nangia, Partner at RNA Technology and IP Attorneys talks about IT Rules 2021, OTT censorship and more.
In our latest post, the authors talk about the Cinematograph (Amendment) Bill, 2021 and its impact on creative freedom, and the legitimacy of the existing institutional mechanisms with respect to film certification.
In this episode of TCLF One-on-One, Dr. Hayleigh Bosher ,Senior Lecturer in Intellectual Property Law at Brunel University London talks about Copyright in music industry and much more.
In this post, the authors aim to analyse the concept of Arbitrator Bias in respect of multi-reference arbitration. In doing so, they particularly focus upon the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court in Halliburton Company v. Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd.
In this article, Achintaya Soni, a third-year law student at University Institute of Legal Studies, Panjab University, has discussed the implications of the recent Supreme Court judgement in NAFED v. Alimenta on enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. The author argues that the interpretation of ‘public policy’by the judiciary is unpredictable and emphasizes the need to narrowly and uniformly interpret the term under the 1996 Arbitration Act.
In this episode, Mr Rahul Rai (of counsel at AZB & Partners and associated with Sr. Adv. Gopal Subramaniam) answers questions related to Competition Law: eCommerce, Data Driven Mergers, Jursidictional Tussle and much more.
In this post, the author analyses the recently concluded Reliance-Future Group Deal from a Competition Law perspective. In doing so, she looks at the applicability of the failing firm defence to the present deal and thereafter moves on to highlighting the future anti-competitive effects of the acquisition.
In this post, the author critically examines the decision of the Hon’ble NCLAT in V. Padmakumar v. Stressed Assets Stabilisation Fund & Anr. The author differs from the majority’s widely debated view holding that the reflection of debt in the balance sheet of the Corporate Debtor does not amount to an acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and argues that sole reliance on Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013 is misplaced and the implication of the balance sheet along with the Directors’ Report and financial statement must be considered holistically.
In this post, the author highlights the meaning and scope of tacit algorithmic collusion in light of the Ola-Uber case and further comments on the adequacy of the existing Competition Law regime to deal with tacit algorithmic collusion.
Are you looking for the easiest way to buy a wife from Asia? You have probably wondered regarding it a bit. All things considered, Thailand is known to be probably the most beautiful places that is known. In fact , Thailand is considered the area of all-natural beauty and the surroundings is some of the …