July 2026

ChatGPT Image Jul 24 2026 at 10 14 49 PM

Dismantling the Conjugal Veto: Constitutionalizing “Cruelty” and “Desertion” in Ann Saurabh Dutt v. Lieutenant Colonel Saurabh Iqbal Bahadur Dutt

ABSTRACT This case comment examines the Supreme Court’s decision in Ann Saurabh Dutt v. Lieutenant Colonel Saurabh Iqbal Bahadur Dutt (2026 INSC 475), where the Court rejected the view that a wife’s pursuit of her professional career and her decision to secure a safer environment for her minor child could amount to matrimonial cruelty or […]

Dismantling the Conjugal Veto: Constitutionalizing “Cruelty” and “Desertion” in Ann Saurabh Dutt v. Lieutenant Colonel Saurabh Iqbal Bahadur Dutt Read More »

Alive, Proximate or Stale? The Curious Case of The Live and Proximate Link Test

Introduction In May, Hon’ble Justice Bhandari of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed an order of detention passed under §3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Trade in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (hereinafter, the PITNDPS) Act, thereby allowing two writ petitions filed by one Dishant Goel. The writs, later allowed, were in the

Alive, Proximate or Stale? The Curious Case of The Live and Proximate Link Test Read More »

The Invisible License: What Zee v. Nykaa Reveals About India’s Social Media Copyright Gap

1.         Introduction: Scroll through any major brand’s Instagram page, and you will hear it: a trending audio clip playing under a product shot, a Bollywood track soundtracking a skincare tutorial, or a chart‑topping song lending energy to a D2C brand’s latest reel. What appears harmless is, at scale, a potential copyright infringement machine embedded

The Invisible License: What Zee v. Nykaa Reveals About India’s Social Media Copyright Gap Read More »

Lis Pendens and the Dismissal Restoration Paradox

Introduction The doctrine of lis pendens has widely operated as a stabilising principle in Indian property jurisprudence. Enshrined in Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, it restrains parties to a suit from transferring immovable property over which substantial rights are in dispute, ensuring that pending litigation cannot be undermined by private transfers

Lis Pendens and the Dismissal Restoration Paradox Read More »

AI Generated Brand Impersonation and the Limits of ‘Use in Course of Trade’ under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (Part II)

III. Passing Off and Safe Harbour: A problematic Immunity In the absence of a clearly applicable remedy under the TMA, 1999, the common law remedy of passing off merits consideration. The classic trinity established in Reckitt & Colman v. Borden, 1990, of goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage, fits well in brand impersonation. A synthetic advertisement that

AI Generated Brand Impersonation and the Limits of ‘Use in Course of Trade’ under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (Part II) Read More »

AI Generated Brand Impersonation and the Limits of ‘Use in Course of Trade’ under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (Part I)

  Consider the following scenario. A brand manager at a well-known consumer goods company. One morning, a colleague sends him a link. It’s a sixty-second video with slick production values, in which the company’s logo sits prominently on a product that the company has never manufactured, their trademarked jingle plays in the background, and a

AI Generated Brand Impersonation and the Limits of ‘Use in Course of Trade’ under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (Part I) Read More »

The Solicitation Prohibition and the Digital Matchmaker: Legal Access Platforms at the Intersection of the Advocates Act 1961, BCI Rule 36, and IT Act Section 79

Introduction The rapid proliferation of digital platforms intermediating access to professional services has tested the boundaries of regulatory frameworks designed for a pre-digital era. In the context of legal services, this test is now acute in a specific, litigated sense. A distinct category of platform has emerged — entities that connect individuals seeking legal assistance

The Solicitation Prohibition and the Digital Matchmaker: Legal Access Platforms at the Intersection of the Advocates Act 1961, BCI Rule 36, and IT Act Section 79 Read More »

Shedding Some Light: Emerging Dark Patterns

BACKGROUND About one in every three urban shoppers in India uses quick commerce for primary grocery shopping. While adoption of quick commerce and other e-commerce platforms has evolved rapidly, the regulatory oversight may be lagging behind. The users may have observed certain features being introduced lately such as apps showing number of drivers that have

Shedding Some Light: Emerging Dark Patterns Read More »