In this post, the author analyses the recent attempts by mainland China to subdue the autonomy of Hong Kong. The author argues that recent laws such as the National Security Act and the Anti-Mask Ban are nothing but an attempt by Mainland China to demolish the fundamental rights of of the citizens of Hong Kong.
In this post, the authors analyse the tenacity of reparations claim against China for the spread of COVID-19. The authors argue that China has not breached its international obligations under various international instruments and is therefore, not liable to make reparations.
The Reparations Claim against China: A Proposition without a Base Read More »
In our latest two part blog post, the author analyses the concepts of ‘With’ and ‘Without Prejudice’ in imposition of costs. In Part 1 of the article, the author refers to the relevant rules and provides a brief understanding of the concepts.
TO BE ‘WITH’ OR ‘WITHOUT’ PREJUDICE-THAT IS THE QUESTION (PART I) Read More »
In Part II, authors explain the functioning of the app alongside elaborating on the privacy concerns. Lastly, the authors highlight instances of judicial intervention and argue for greater accountability and effective legal recourse for any data breach.
AAROGYA SETU: A BRIDGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION? (PART-II) Read More »
In our latest two part blog post, the authors comprehensively highlight privacy and data protection concerns surrounding the Aarogya Setu App.
In Part I, authors delineate the concept of consent and prima-facie concerns with the application.
AAROGYA SETU: A BRIDGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION? (PART-I) Read More »
In this post, the authors analyse the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Triloki Nath Singh v. Anirudh Singh and argue that the Court erred in its findings by deviating from accepted legal principles regarding representative suits and compromise decree.
In this post, the authors analyse the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act of 2019 from a constitutional perspective, arguing that Section 35 of the Act presents particular dangers to free speech under the Constitution.
In this post, the authors provide some interesting solutions for resolving the ambiguity surrounding the treatment of the concept of attribution in Investor-State Arbitrations.
In Part-2 of the article, the authors highlight the legal principles emerging from US-Copyright Act case and argue for the need to incentivise Article 25 arbitration as a dispute settlement mechanism.
(In our latest two part blog post, the authors talk about the need to incentivise WTO Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU Agreement in light of the prevailing appellate body crisis.) In Part-1 of the article, the authors highlight the key features of Article 25 arbitrations.
