April 2025

images 1

GENDER ROLES AND INHERITANCE RIGHTS IN INDIAN TRIBES: INSIGHT FROM KAMLA NETI V. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

INTRODUCTION ‘Inherent differences’ between men and women, we have come to appreciate, remain a cause for celebration, but not for the denigration of the members of either sex or for artificial constraints on an individual’s opportunity. Sex classifications may be used to compensate women ‘for particular economic disabilities [they have] suffered,’ But such classifications may […]

GENDER ROLES AND INHERITANCE RIGHTS IN INDIAN TRIBES: INSIGHT FROM KAMLA NETI V. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER Read More »

A Critique of Naresh Meena v State of UP and the Practice of Marriage-Conditional Bail in India: Part II

[continued] Statutory and Constitutional Violations The practice of granting bail to rape accused on the condition that they marry their victims is legally indefensible. As demonstrated through the critique of various high court rulings in the previous section, these judgments blatantly violate multiple statutory provisions in the IPC, POCSOA and PCMA, disregarding the legal framework

A Critique of Naresh Meena v State of UP and the Practice of Marriage-Conditional Bail in India: Part II Read More »

A Critique of Naresh Meena v State of UP and the Practice of Marriage-Conditional Bail in India: Part I

Introduction The Indian judiciary has a disturbing history of granting bail to rape accused on the condition that they marry their victims. This practice is not only legally flawed but also profoundly unjust, as it forces survivors into coerced relationships with their perpetrators rather than ensuring their right to justice. Such rulings violate multiple statutory

A Critique of Naresh Meena v State of UP and the Practice of Marriage-Conditional Bail in India: Part I Read More »