In this post, the authors provide some interesting solutions for resolving the ambiguity surrounding the treatment of the concept of attribution in Investor-State Arbitrations.
In the second Episode of TCLF One-on-One, Sr. Advocate Aparajita Singh talks about the reality of Environmental Litigation, Delhi Air Pollution case and much more.
(In our latest two part blog post, the authors talk about the need to incentivise WTO Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU Agreement in light of the prevailing appellate body crisis.) In Part-1 of the article, the authors highlight the key features of Article 25 arbitrations.
In this post, the authors assess the legality of many precautionary measures taken by private establishments and Central/State Governments during the pandemic in light of existing and forthcoming privacy law.
Privacy in the times of COVID-19 Read More »
In the first episode, Ms. Bhati talks about her journey as a Litigator, some memorable cases of her career and much more.
We are proud to present to you all ‘TCLF One-on-One’ series.Through the “One-on-One” series, we aim to interact with the best legal professionals from India and abroad on diverse themes of law.We hope that these interactions will provide new insights to law students and young practitioners.
TCLF ONE-ON-ONE IS LIVE ! Read More »
In this post, the author presents an analysis on the much debated question of victim’s right to appeal for enhancement of sentence. Emphasising upon the need to find a balance, the author presents compelling arguments from both sides of the spectrum.
Victim’s right to appeal for enhancement of sentence: a myth or reality? Read More »
This post aims to introduce Mary Prior QC, the recent addition to our stellar Board of Advisors.
Mary Prior QC is now on TCLF Board of Advisors! Read More »
In this post, the author writes on the recent Gömböc judgement from the perspective of pre-existing IPRs.
The non-systematic relevance of earlier IP rights: from Gömböc to Brompton Bicycle Read More »
“There is no doubt that a judgment, an order or the whole decision-making process can be criticised on merits but can legal errors committed by a judge constitute judicial misconduct? If yes, when can legitimate questions regarding the breach of judicial integrity be raised on the basis of legal errors committed by a judge? Further, can mere suspicion lead to the establishment of judicial misconduct?”
