In this post, the authors critically analyze the applicability of the Group of Companies Doctrine in arbitration proceedings and highlight the importance of party consent and autonomy in light of the international arbitration rules. The authors identify the conflicting stance of Indian Courts while analyzing the impact of Arupri Judgement on this conflict.
In the latest episode of the TCLF One-on-One Series, We were honoured to host Ms. Ereblinda Sadiku who talks about Responsibilities of a Counsel at an International Arbitration Institution, Institutional vs. Ad-Hoc Arbitrations and Teaching Methods in Civil Law jurisdictions
In this post, the authors analyse the decision of the Delhi High Court in Union of India v. Reliance Industries Ltd. to argue that allowing arbitrators to rule on their own impartiality potentially violates this principle of natural justice.
In the latest episode of the TCLF One-on-One Series, Mr. Saurabh Bindal talks about Third Party Funding within the Indian Perspective and much more.
In this post, the author aims to throw light at the current framework and hesitancy in virtual hearings in Indian arbitration proceedings, and compare the same with the efforts of the international community in this regard, as well as highlight the possible future.
In this episode of TCLF One-on-One, Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, Partner at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Arbitration Team talks about meaning and utility of Emergency Arbitration, Indian Approach towards Emergency Arbitration, the effect of Amazon-Future Group dispute and more.
In this episode of TCLF One-on-One, Kshama A. Loya, Leader of International Commercial & Investment Arbitration, Nishith Desai Associates, talks about the recent Vodafone-Cairn cases.
In this post, the authors aim to analyse the concept of Arbitrator Bias in respect of multi-reference arbitration. In doing so, they particularly focus upon the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court in Halliburton Company v. Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd.
In this article, Achintaya Soni, a third-year law student at University Institute of Legal Studies, Panjab University, has discussed the implications of the recent Supreme Court judgement in NAFED v. Alimenta on enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. The author argues that the interpretation of ‘public policy’by the judiciary is unpredictable and emphasizes the need to narrowly and uniformly interpret the term under the 1996 Arbitration Act.
In the 7th episode of TCLF ONE-ON-ONE Mr. Ankit Sahni(IP Lawyer, New Delhi) and Mr. Salah Mattoo (Senior Associate, Winston and Strawn LLP) talk about the impact of the COVID crisis on the International arbitration practice, the onset of virtual proceedings, potential Intellectual Property concerns and much more.
