![Online Hearing Court Arbitration (Copy)](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="480" height="270"><rect width="100%" height="100%"><animate attributeName="fill" values="rgba(153,153,153,0.5);rgba(153,153,153,0.1);rgba(153,153,153,0.5)" dur="2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></rect></svg>)
In this post, the author aims to throw light at the current framework and hesitancy in virtual hearings in Indian arbitration proceedings, and compare the same with the efforts of the international community in this regard, as well as highlight the possible future.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="1024" height="576"><rect width="100%" height="100%"><animate attributeName="fill" values="rgba(153,153,153,0.5);rgba(153,153,153,0.1);rgba(153,153,153,0.5)" dur="2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></rect></svg>)
In this episode of TCLF One-on-One, Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, Partner at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Arbitration Team talks about meaning and utility of Emergency Arbitration, Indian Approach towards Emergency Arbitration, the effect of Amazon-Future Group dispute and more.
![Kshama Loya : India's Investment Arbitration](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="480" height="360"><rect width="100%" height="100%"><animate attributeName="fill" values="rgba(153,153,153,0.5);rgba(153,153,153,0.1);rgba(153,153,153,0.5)" dur="2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></rect></svg>)
In this episode of TCLF One-on-One, Kshama A. Loya, Leader of International Commercial & Investment Arbitration, Nishith Desai Associates, talks about the recent Vodafone-Cairn cases.
![Biased Impartial Judge Arbitrator (Copy)](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="485" height="273"><rect width="100%" height="100%"><animate attributeName="fill" values="rgba(153,153,153,0.5);rgba(153,153,153,0.1);rgba(153,153,153,0.5)" dur="2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></rect></svg>)
In this post, the authors aim to analyse the concept of Arbitrator Bias in respect of multi-reference arbitration. In doing so, they particularly focus upon the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court in Halliburton Company v. Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd.
![Public Policy Arbitral Award](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="730" height="419"><rect width="100%" height="100%"><animate attributeName="fill" values="rgba(153,153,153,0.5);rgba(153,153,153,0.1);rgba(153,153,153,0.5)" dur="2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></rect></svg>)
In this article, Achintaya Soni, a third-year law student at University Institute of Legal Studies, Panjab University, has discussed the implications of the recent Supreme Court judgement in NAFED v. Alimenta on enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. The author argues that the interpretation of ‘public policy’by the judiciary is unpredictable and emphasizes the need to narrowly and uniformly interpret the term under the 1996 Arbitration Act.
In the 7th episode of TCLF ONE-ON-ONE Mr. Ankit Sahni(IP Lawyer, New Delhi) and Mr. Salah Mattoo (Senior Associate, Winston and Strawn LLP) talk about the impact of the COVID crisis on the International arbitration practice, the onset of virtual proceedings, potential Intellectual Property concerns and much more.
In the latest episode of TCLF One-on-One, Ms. Radha Raghavan (Of Counsel at Draper and Draper LLC, New York) talks about her experience of working in New York, a commercial hub and popular seat for International Arbitrations, emerging issues in International Investment disputes, FDI prospects for India and much more.
In the latest episode of TCLF One-on-One, Mr. Shivam Singh (Counsel, Supreme Court and High Courts currently associated with Chamber 20A) talks about his first encounter with sports law as a subject, changes in viewership trends, impact of Covid-19 on players agreements and much more.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="1024" height="614"><rect width="100%" height="100%"><animate attributeName="fill" values="rgba(153,153,153,0.5);rgba(153,153,153,0.1);rgba(153,153,153,0.5)" dur="2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></rect></svg>)
In this post, the authors provide some interesting solutions for resolving the ambiguity surrounding the treatment of the concept of attribution in Investor-State Arbitrations.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="666" height="403"><rect width="100%" height="100%"><animate attributeName="fill" values="rgba(153,153,153,0.5);rgba(153,153,153,0.1);rgba(153,153,153,0.5)" dur="2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></rect></svg>)
In Part-2 of the article, the authors highlight the legal principles emerging from US-Copyright Act case and argue for the need to incentivise Article 25 arbitration as a dispute settlement mechanism.
![THE CONTEMPORARY LAW FORUM](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="440" height="87"><rect width="100%" height="100%"><animate attributeName="fill" values="rgba(153,153,153,0.5);rgba(153,153,153,0.1);rgba(153,153,153,0.5)" dur="2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></rect></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="440" height="123"><rect width="100%" height="100%"><animate attributeName="fill" values="rgba(153,153,153,0.5);rgba(153,153,153,0.1);rgba(153,153,153,0.5)" dur="2s" repeatCount="indefinite" /></rect></svg>)